Literacy Project Reading Instruction Delivery Model
Purpose: To provide differentiated reading instruction that targets students' ZPD and incorporates all of the big 5 (as relevant to student need).The Big 5 includes phonemic awareness, phonics, fluency, comprehension, and vocabulary. These fall into the following four categories that make literacy instruction balanced: Fluency, Word Work, Comprehension, and Refining Reading.
What does this look like in Room 106?
Here is my literacy plan for this week...
Reading
Component
|
Monday
|
Tuesday
|
Wednesday
|
Thursday
|
Friday
|
Word Work
9:00-9:15
|
Tier
III Vocabulary
(Week
1 Terms)
·
Migrate
·
Natural
Resources
·
Origin
Stories
·
Adaptations
·
Kiva
|
(Week
2 Terms)
·
Geography
·
Climate
·
Latitude
·
Longitude
·
Compass
|
Modified
Frayer Model
1.
Definition
2.
Context
Sentence
3.
Illustration/sketch
4.
Connection
|
Continue
Frayer Model
|
Vocabulary
Quiz
(Students
fill in sentences with missing vocabulary term.)
|
Fluency
9:25-9:40
*Incorporated into Social Studies opening to lead
into daily S.S. activities.
|
Social
Studies Alive! Introduction
·
Unison
·
Antiphonal
·
Line
Around (Paragraph around)
|
Social
Studies Alive!
Identifying
reasons the North and South were fighting
|
Social
Studies Alive!
Life
on the Home front
|
Social
Studies Alive!
Key
Battles
|
Social
Studies Alive!
The
End of the War
|
Compre-hension
10:20-10:40
|
Sign
of the Beaver Ch.
4
Purpose: Determine challenges faced
by Matt. Model how to annotate challenges faced by Matt. Think aloud how to
determine how Matt adapts to the challenges.
|
Integrated
Writing:
Using
details from the text describe how Matt adapted to challenges he faced during
chapter 4.
|
Sign
of the Beaver
Ch. 4 and Ch. 5
Partners
work to identify challenges Matt adapted to in Ch. 5.
Discuss
learning.
Individual
Assessment:
A.
Using
details from the text describe how Matt adapted to challenges he faced in
Chapter’s 4 and 5.
B.
Explain
how Matt was already well-suited to survive.
|
“Hot
to Trot: The Secrets and Superstitions of Jockey Fashions”
Modified
Close Read
Main
idea.
Phrase
meanings.
2
MCQ Quick Check
|
“Racing
Silks in Every Color, Provided You Wear a Small”
Modified
Close Read
Author’s
POV.
Phrase
meanings.
2
MCQ Quick Check
Compare
BOTH texts from Thurs. and Fri.
|
Refining Reading
11:00-11:50
|
Schedule
is flexible for students depending on when they are pulled into small groups.
Students are able to determine the order in which they would like to complete
the workshop activities.
|
1)
Tic-Tac-Toe board
(Comprehension)
Students
have choice of what literary text to read. Students choose 4 options from the
choice board and complete according to the directions.
|
2)
Fluency
Students
time each other, practice the text, respond to comprehension questions, and
determine the meaning of unknown tier II vocabulary terms.
|
3)
Topic Journal
(Reflection)
Students
pick a journal and write a free response or read and comment on other student
responses.
|
4)
Lexia
Mixed-Skill
iPad learning program.
|
Guided
Reading/
Focus Groups
11:00-11:50
|
11:00-11:30
Focus Group
“No
More Super-Sized Sodas”
Tamesha
Nevaeh
Kayden
Gabby
Lakyn
Kayden
Summarizing.
|
11:00-11:30
Focus Group “Let Me Drink What I Want”
Tamesha
Nevaeh
Kayden
Gabby
Lakyn
Kayden
Author’s
opinion and supporting reasons.
|
11:00-11:30
Word Work
“Larry
Bird”
(Theory,
resort, assiduous, withdrew, accolades, ethic, tenacity)
Elijah
Andrew
Isaiah
Ray
|
11:00-11:30
Comprehension
“Larry
Bird”
Text
dependent comprehension check.
Elijah
Andrew
Isaiah
Ray
|
11:00-11:30
Focus Group-Theme
“Twins
Luck”
Anija
Jason
Jashuad
Complete
reading. Answer MCQ quick check.
|
11:30-11:50
Focus Group
“No
More Super-Sized Sodas”
Elijah
Andrew
Isaiah
Ray
William
Lemar
Main
idea and supporting details.
|
11:30-11:50
Focus Group-Theme
“Twins
Luck”
Anija
Jason
Jashuad
Discuss
focus.
Read
and annotate main characters and events.
|
11:30-11:50
Guided Reading-Comprehension-Locating evidence in the text.
“The
Derby Festival: Kentucky’s Pre-Derby Party”
Tamesha
Nevaeh
Kayden
Gabby
Lakyn
Kayden
|
11:30-11:50
Focus Group
“Let
Me Drink What I Want”
Elijah
Andrew
Isaiah
Ray
William
Lemar
Summarizing.
|
11:30-11:50
Response
to Intervention Probes
Conferring
with individual students.
Kayden
(Shiloh)
Gabby
(Shiloh)
|
|
11:50-12:00 Reflection: Students fill out daily accountability log for
“choice” activities. What did you learn today during workshop? What
strategies did you use to help your understanding of your text? Do you have
any questions or concerns about your reading? Did anything you read today
give you something to look further into?
|
So what does all of this look like in action?For each component I gathered artifacts to display the components in action. Some activities could fit into multiple component categories.
The artifacts display evidence of:
1) student engagement during the specific component
2) an assessment tool and analysis for instructional grouping
3) instructional strategy being implemented.
Fluency
2) Assessment Tool: This text was used to determine the text that would be used in the fluency workstation that fit the twelve students in the classroom during workshop.
After students practiced the passage they answer 3 open-ended questions to assess their understanding. Students then chose 2 tier II words to diagram for further understand. Below is the organizer students filled out for their chosen vocabulary words.
3) Instructional Strategy-Whole Class Choral Reading: This week the grade-level text utilized for whole class choral reading was our Social Studies text book. This was the introduction to our main social studies lesson for the day. It lasted about 15 minutes. Before reading, I set a purpose for what to annotate with imaginary markings (because we cannot write in our books.) Throughout the week we participated in various types of choral reading. The students are most engaged when we read in unison or when groups of students read an entire paragraph.
Comprehension
2)Assessment Tool: Modified Close Read for Guided reading with a focus on author's purpose.
Text students referred to.
Pre-planned text dependent questions that will lead students in understand the author's purpose.
Short answer students will answer when modified close read is complete.
3)Instructional Strategy: Mini-Lesson-I modeled how to determine how a character adapts to challenges.
Word Work
1) Student Engagement: Student notebook with a modified frayer model of weekly vocabulary words. Students write the definition, draw a simple sketch, write the word in contextual sentence, and make some type of connection.
2) Assessment Tool: I chose 7 tier II words from the text that I chose for a guided reading group that focused on the group being able to find evidence in the text to support their understanding of key text dependent questions. I used a modified version of the Vocabulary Knowledge Scale. The students expressed their knowledge of the words.
This text was chosen in conjunction with student interest and purpose of the group. These students were having difficulty using the text to find evidence for key comprehension questions. This is the text I chose the vocabulary terms from.
This assessment was created with the vocabulary words students broke apart using the Frayer model. Contextual sentences are used to ensure students understand the term rather than just memorizing the definition.
3) Instructional Strategy: Marzano's Six Steps- Small group acting out the meaning of accolade. Student on the right is accepting his accolade and tearing up with joy.
This is the page I created to utilize while implementing the 6 steps. Students recorded ideas in their notebooks.
Refining Reading
2)Assessment Tool: Reading Proficiency results are utilized to create focus groups. This data was used to determine students that would be in the theme group, which students needed work on vocabulary skills, main ideas and supporting details, and summarizing. These assessments are administered and analyzed every nine weeks to guide instruction.
3) Instructional Strategy: Guided Reading- The first session with the students included a discussion of theme, discussing the title, making predictions based on the title, and beginning to annotate character notes. After this group is able to describe characters, we will annotate main events that influence character actions, thoughts, motives ect. From those annotations we will develop a message or lesson learned from the story.
I am sure that as I continue to create a well-balanced literacy block items will be modified and adjusted. I hope that you were able to gain some understanding of ways to incorporate research-based instructional strategies to increase student achievement. This project also brought to surface how many things are related and connected. As educators we just need to remember to always be intentional in our planning! Let me know if you have any ideas, suggestions, or questions! I love learning with others.
Happy Reading!
xoxo-Kim